On April 2, 2026, the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine Andriy Sybiha stated that Kyiv is ready to join international efforts to unblock the Strait of Hormuz. According to him, Iran’s actions in this strategic hub increasingly resemble the tactics that Russia previously used in the Black Sea.
The statement was made on April 2 at an international meeting chaired by UK Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper. Sybiha directly linked the situation in the Strait of Hormuz to Russia’s war against Ukraine and warned: terrorist regimes not only act in parallel but also adopt methods from each other.
For the Israeli audience, this topic is of particular importance. The Strait of Hormuz remains one of the most important arteries of global energy, and any pressure on the freedom of navigation in the region immediately affects prices, supply security, and the overall strategic stability of the Middle East.
Ukraine saw a familiar Black Sea scheme in Iran’s actions
Sybiha compared Iran to Russia
The head of the Ukrainian Foreign Ministry stated that Iran’s tactics in the Strait of Hormuz largely repeat the model that Moscow used in the Black Sea. In his assessment, the goal in both cases is the same: to destabilize global markets and use vital routes as a tool of pressure on other states.
Sybiha emphasized that Iran, in essence, studied the Russian experience, learned from others’ mistakes, and adapted similar methods for its own purposes. If Russia a few years ago tried to weaponize food and maritime exports, now Iran seeks to use fuel and energy in this role.
Such a comparison is important not only from a diplomatic point of view. It shows that Kyiv views the crisis in the Strait of Hormuz not as a local episode in the Middle East but as part of a broader system of threats where authoritarian regimes test similar mechanisms of blackmail.
Why this is important not only for Ukraine
Sybiha separately noted that the stability of global markets is directly important for Ukraine.
Kyiv, according to him, does not intend to allow Russia to benefit from Middle Eastern instability and use new upheavals to finance its war.
This statement is especially relevant for Israel, which is in close proximity to the tension zone. Any escalation around the Strait of Hormuz affects not only oil routes but also the entire balance of power in the region, including the security of maritime trade, supply insurance, and international logistics chains.
Kyiv offers not theory, but practical experience
Ukraine reminded of its own blockade breakthrough
The Ukrainian minister emphasized that Kyiv has not just a political position but real practical experience in overcoming a maritime blockade. He reminded that Ukraine managed to break Russian pressure in the Black Sea thanks to a combination of a well-thought-out strategy and the use of maritime drones.
In essence, Kyiv is now offering international partners not abstract support but knowledge gained in the conditions of real war. This is an important signal: Ukraine is trying to establish itself as a state capable of sharing not only requests for help but also its own security solutions.
This is why the topic goes far beyond Ukrainian diplomacy. When NANews — Israel News | Nikk.Agency follows such statements, it is not just about international chronicles. It is a question of how the experience of war in Eastern Europe begins to influence the discussion on Middle Eastern security, maritime corridors, and the collective response to threats from Iran.
Freedom of navigation becomes a common security issue
Sybiha emphasized that Ukraine’s position remains perfectly clear: terrorism must receive a tough response, and freedom of navigation must be protected. In this context, he also reminded of the importance of adhering to the principles of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea — both in the Black Sea and in the Strait of Hormuz.
Such an emphasis is important for the international audience because it is not only about a specific military threat but also about the rules on which global trade is based. If key maritime arteries become a tool of blackmail, the consequences quickly go beyond a single conflict and affect entire regions.
What Sybiha’s statement means for the Middle East
Ukraine is ready for joint work
At the end of his speech, the head of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine stated that the blockade must be ended, and Kyiv is ready to work with countries in the region in a bilateral format and interact with transatlantic partners. In other words, Ukraine openly offered its contribution to efforts to ensure the security of navigation.
This formulation may interest not only European capitals but also Middle Eastern states. Against the backdrop of growing tensions around Iran, a new diplomatic storyline emerges: a country that has already experienced an attempt at maritime strangulation offers to use its experience in another strategic strait.
The Israeli perspective on the new reality
For Israel, such signals are especially sensitive.
In recent years, it has become evident that Russia’s war against Ukraine and Iran’s actions in the Middle East are increasingly seen as interconnected elements of a broader threat. When Sybiha says that terrorist regimes exchange experiences, he is essentially formulating the logic that is becoming increasingly apparent in the Israeli assessment of regional risks.
Therefore, Kyiv’s statement about readiness to participate in unblocking the Strait of Hormuz is not just a diplomatic remark. It is a sign that the Ukrainian experience of war is beginning to be perceived as part of a global conversation about how to respond to maritime blackmail, protect international routes, and prevent Iran and its allies from dictating terms to the world.